<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for bitplumber.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitplumber.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitplumber.net</link>
	<description>A place for Google to index my learnings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Configure Jumbo Frames by Bane</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/03/how-to-configure-jumbo-frames/comment-page-1/#comment-13035</link>
		<dc:creator>Bane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=82#comment-13035</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1867&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@John&lt;/a&gt; 
Hi John,
I have same situation, 50% utilization on Gbit/s link. Did you solved this? I tried everything but without sucess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1867" rel="nofollow">@John</a><br />
Hi John,<br />
I have same situation, 50% utilization on Gbit/s link. Did you solved this? I tried everything but without sucess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of moving from NeuStar UltraDNS to Dynect Managed DNS Service by LOE</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2010/05/review-of-moving-from-neustar-ultradns-to-dynect-managed-dns-service/comment-page-1/#comment-13015</link>
		<dc:creator>LOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=452#comment-13015</guid>
		<description>The first comment in this post couldn&#039;t be further from the truth. Dynect is far from a hobbyist service... As for Neustarr, while UltraDNS is a great service, it&#039;s grossly overpriced. Neustar&#039;s management is also awful. Their sales tactics are aggressive to an almost disgusting level.  Their sales people are frequently rotated around and many times misrepresent the product they&#039;re pushing. Things to note is that you cannot downgrade your package from a higher tier to a lower tier. They won&#039;t even want to talk to you. Never trust their sales person&#039;s estimate of which query package you&#039;re going to need. If you are coming from using your webhosts DNS servers or your domain providers DNS servers, do your own research prior to committing to a query package with them. I&#039;ve NOT had good experiences with Neustar. I think Dynect is a much better company/service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first comment in this post couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth. Dynect is far from a hobbyist service&#8230; As for Neustarr, while UltraDNS is a great service, it&#8217;s grossly overpriced. Neustar&#8217;s management is also awful. Their sales tactics are aggressive to an almost disgusting level.  Their sales people are frequently rotated around and many times misrepresent the product they&#8217;re pushing. Things to note is that you cannot downgrade your package from a higher tier to a lower tier. They won&#8217;t even want to talk to you. Never trust their sales person&#8217;s estimate of which query package you&#8217;re going to need. If you are coming from using your webhosts DNS servers or your domain providers DNS servers, do your own research prior to committing to a query package with them. I&#8217;ve NOT had good experiences with Neustar. I think Dynect is a much better company/service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of moving from NeuStar UltraDNS to Dynect Managed DNS Service by eprosenx</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2010/05/review-of-moving-from-neustar-ultradns-to-dynect-managed-dns-service/comment-page-1/#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>eprosenx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 06:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=452#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>I disagree that Dynect is just a &quot;hobbyist&quot; service.  Their commercial offering is based off an Anycast network design that currently has 12 nodes (similar to UltraDNS and it would appear also similar to dns.com which claims to have 8 nodes currently).

It is true that Dynect has it&#039;s root in the free &quot;dyndns.org&quot; project, but it is clear to me that their offering has &quot;grown up&quot;.  I have been impressed with how fluid the administration console is, and how quickly updates I make propagate out to the anycast nodes.

My dealings with Dynect have been completely professional in nature and they did not come off feeling like a bunch of amateurs.  I did have that concern in the back of my mind as well before I started my evaluation of options.

Interestingly enough, DNS.com did not come up in any of my searching or through my contact network, but it does look interesting.  It appears to be trying to break into UltraDNS&#039;s market as well.  I don&#039;t have any facts to base an opinion on them yet.  Perhaps I will give them a spin next time around.  ;-)

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that Dynect is just a &#8220;hobbyist&#8221; service.  Their commercial offering is based off an Anycast network design that currently has 12 nodes (similar to UltraDNS and it would appear also similar to dns.com which claims to have 8 nodes currently).</p>
<p>It is true that Dynect has it&#8217;s root in the free &#8220;dyndns.org&#8221; project, but it is clear to me that their offering has &#8220;grown up&#8221;.  I have been impressed with how fluid the administration console is, and how quickly updates I make propagate out to the anycast nodes.</p>
<p>My dealings with Dynect have been completely professional in nature and they did not come off feeling like a bunch of amateurs.  I did have that concern in the back of my mind as well before I started my evaluation of options.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, DNS.com did not come up in any of my searching or through my contact network, but it does look interesting.  It appears to be trying to break into UltraDNS&#8217;s market as well.  I don&#8217;t have any facts to base an opinion on them yet.  Perhaps I will give them a spin next time around.  <img src='http://www.bitplumber.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of moving from NeuStar UltraDNS to Dynect Managed DNS Service by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2010/05/review-of-moving-from-neustar-ultradns-to-dynect-managed-dns-service/comment-page-1/#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=452#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>Dynect is just dyndns.org&#039;s hobbyist DNS service trying to rebrand itself. You should check out DNS.com, they are the new and hotness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dynect is just dyndns.org&#8217;s hobbyist DNS service trying to rebrand itself. You should check out DNS.com, they are the new and hotness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cisco ASA 8.0.5 TFTP Unspecified Error using PumpKIN by Wallis Short</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/12/cisco-asa-805-tftp-unspecified-error-using-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallis Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=438#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>There is an issue with some TFTP servers handling large files etc. In the old days cisco tftp could not handle any size over 16Mb etc and I suspect Pumpkin does the same. I know SolarWinds is not immune to it as I had a problem with them a couple of weeks ago uploading large Voice files to a 2811&#039;s flash memory. The tftp server i now use ( and it handles large files - biggest I have had is 103Mb) is the opensource 3CDeamon TFTP server. Try that , i&#039;m sure you wont have any issues.
Cheers
Wallis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an issue with some TFTP servers handling large files etc. In the old days cisco tftp could not handle any size over 16Mb etc and I suspect Pumpkin does the same. I know SolarWinds is not immune to it as I had a problem with them a couple of weeks ago uploading large Voice files to a 2811&#8217;s flash memory. The tftp server i now use ( and it handles large files &#8211; biggest I have had is 103Mb) is the opensource 3CDeamon TFTP server. Try that , i&#8217;m sure you wont have any issues.<br />
Cheers<br />
Wallis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cisco Router/Switch Standard Configuration Checklist by JR</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/03/cisco-router-switch-standard-configuration-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-11025</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=169#comment-11025</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this useful checklist. I will be using it as a foundation for our new Cisco builds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this useful checklist. I will be using it as a foundation for our new Cisco builds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colo &amp; Telecom Providers by Keith Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/portland-oregon-colocation-telecommunications-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-10641</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?page_id=7#comment-10641</guid>
		<description>Eric,

An excellent overview of the Portland area. And a very good unbiased approach at describing most of the current telecom players in Portland Metro.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>An excellent overview of the Portland area. And a very good unbiased approach at describing most of the current telecom players in Portland Metro.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qwest DSL Installation With Actiontec M1000 by eprosenx</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/04/qwest-dsl-installation-with-actiontec-m1000/comment-page-1/#comment-10449</link>
		<dc:creator>eprosenx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=225#comment-10449</guid>
		<description>Hmm, what you describe should not be impacted by having a reverse DNS entry or not.  The type of reverse entry I am referring to is a real in-addr.arpa entry (i.e. 1.2.2.4.in-addr.arpa. for 4.2.2.1 as an example) out on the open internet (not an internal network thing).

The reason a reverse DNS entry is required is for outbound mail to certain domains.  I believe Comcast and AOL are two of the prime offenders that require some kind of reverse DNS entry to exist for a host that sends them mail or else they will bounce it (or refuse to accept it).

For inbound mail to work you need an &quot;MX&quot; record pointed at an &quot;A&quot; record that points to your IP address.

Good luck!

P.S.  Its worth noting that a lot of ISP&#039;s block port 25, so perhaps your getting caught up in that?  If you have another host you can login to somewhere else on the internet go to a shell prompt and type &quot;telnet &lt;ipaddress&gt; 25&quot;.  If the screen clears and you get a black screen then a TCP connection worked.  If it fails to connect then perhaps Qwest is blocking port 25, or your router is not forwarding the connection properly.

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, what you describe should not be impacted by having a reverse DNS entry or not.  The type of reverse entry I am referring to is a real in-addr.arpa entry (i.e. 1.2.2.4.in-addr.arpa. for 4.2.2.1 as an example) out on the open internet (not an internal network thing).</p>
<p>The reason a reverse DNS entry is required is for outbound mail to certain domains.  I believe Comcast and AOL are two of the prime offenders that require some kind of reverse DNS entry to exist for a host that sends them mail or else they will bounce it (or refuse to accept it).</p>
<p>For inbound mail to work you need an &#8220;MX&#8221; record pointed at an &#8220;A&#8221; record that points to your IP address.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>P.S.  Its worth noting that a lot of ISP&#8217;s block port 25, so perhaps your getting caught up in that?  If you have another host you can login to somewhere else on the internet go to a shell prompt and type &#8220;telnet <ipaddress> 25&#8243;.  If the screen clears and you get a black screen then a TCP connection worked.  If it fails to connect then perhaps Qwest is blocking port 25, or your router is not forwarding the connection properly.</p>
<p>-Eric</ipaddress></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qwest DSL Installation With Actiontec M1000 by charles bretana</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/04/qwest-dsl-installation-with-actiontec-m1000/comment-page-1/#comment-10448</link>
		<dc:creator>charles bretana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=225#comment-10448</guid>
		<description>Why is a reverse dns entry required to run a mail server? Are you talking about internal private network dns entries (for internal servers)?  or are you talking about reverse dns for my public domain name?

I have new 12 MBps Qwest DSL running through ActionTec pk5000 with ports 25 and 443 forwarded to my internal Ms Exchange Edge and Mail OWA servers respectively... I know the 443 port forwading works because I can get to the OWA web page from outside.. But no mail I send to myself (like from GMail), is reaching the Exchange server... Is this because of not having reverse dns set up properly somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is a reverse dns entry required to run a mail server? Are you talking about internal private network dns entries (for internal servers)?  or are you talking about reverse dns for my public domain name?</p>
<p>I have new 12 MBps Qwest DSL running through ActionTec pk5000 with ports 25 and 443 forwarded to my internal Ms Exchange Edge and Mail OWA servers respectively&#8230; I know the 443 port forwading works because I can get to the OWA web page from outside.. But no mail I send to myself (like from GMail), is reaching the Exchange server&#8230; Is this because of not having reverse dns set up properly somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Configure Jumbo Frames by eprosenx</title>
		<link>http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/03/how-to-configure-jumbo-frames/comment-page-1/#comment-10438</link>
		<dc:creator>eprosenx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitplumber.net/?p=82#comment-10438</guid>
		<description>No, there is no auto-negotiation whatsoever for frame sizes.  The 10/100 switch (router) will likely just drop any frame over 1500 bytes that came into it from the switch that supported jumbo frames.  :-(

You could create two separate networks (one jumbo frame enabled, and one not), but they would need separate IP subnets and then you may need routing between them depending on what you are trying to do.

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, there is no auto-negotiation whatsoever for frame sizes.  The 10/100 switch (router) will likely just drop any frame over 1500 bytes that came into it from the switch that supported jumbo frames.  <img src='http://www.bitplumber.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You could create two separate networks (one jumbo frame enabled, and one not), but they would need separate IP subnets and then you may need routing between them depending on what you are trying to do.</p>
<p>-Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
