Comments for bitplumber.net

Comment on Sniffing SSL TLS Sessions with Wireshark by Alex Railean

Alex Railean — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:10:03 +0000

Give a try to oSpy, it is a sniffer that allows you to view HTTPS traffic, provided that you’re running it on Windows and the program that generates the traffic uses the Wincrypt API.

It is not a universal tool, but for a subset of tasks it is exactly what one needs.

Comment on Getting DIG to work on Windows by eprosenx

eprosenx — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:51:38 +0000

@jamkomo I did that a long time ago the first time I installed DIG on Windows, but since then it seems to have "just worked". I think it reads the system DNS servers as the default if that file does not exist. -Eric

Comment on Getting DIG to work on Windows by jamkomo

jamkomo — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:46:05 +0000

Did you put your company’s nameservers in \windows\system32\drivers\etc?

Comment on Cisco AnyConnect Split-DNS resolution not working in Snow Leopard 10.6 by eprosenx

eprosenx — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:49:03 +0000

@CPH I actually just discovered last week that Snow Leopard now has a built in Cisco IPSEC VPN client! I would highly recommend using that instead. It has worked well for me so far. I am going to put up a blog post about it here shortly. -Eric

Comment on Cisco AnyConnect Split-DNS resolution not working in Snow Leopard 10.6 by CPH

CPH — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:50:53 +0000

Hello there! I am having the same problem, please post as soon as you find this is resolved! I use an ASA 5510 with the AnyConnect client 2.4.0202 as well. My snow leopard macs can only connect via IP, not by name.

Comment on Getting DIG to work on Windows by don

don — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:50:30 +0000

Good how-to. Thanks

Comment on Google Recursive DNS Speed Test by Jon Radoff

Jon Radoff — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:02:38 +0000

Thanks for posting your own results. As I mentioned in the article, I thought people would have results that vary quite a bit. Your ISP will determine a lot of your results. I wanted to encourage people to find out for themselves.

Comment on Sun X4100 and X4200 Lower Non-critical going low by eprosenx

eprosenx — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:32:51 +0000

A good point, though we are pretty darned certain this is not an input power supply issue. We are in a very nice datacenter with two separate power paths that both flow through double online conversion UPS’s. None of our other equipment has experienced issues. Also, the messages being logged by the iLOM’s seem to refer to DC voltage issues, not AC voltage issues on the input side. We have even had power supplies and power distribution boards in many of the servers swapped out to attempt to combat this issue (before Sun confirmed it was a firmware problem).

-Eric

Comment on Sun X4100 and X4200 Lower Non-critical going low by spenser

spenser — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:30:28 +0000

Could it just be power fluctuatins kicking the power supply voldtages around?

Anyways, ILOM has been rock solid here.

Comment on Cisco 3750 Delayed Power On by binary617

binary617 — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:38:56 +0000

I’ve seen this happen as well on a few WS-C3750G-24TS.